Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation: Stock Comparison
Share price, earnings, valuation and dividends side by side.
Applied Materials, Inc. has a market cap of $264B and Lam Research Corporation $251B, so Applied Materials, Inc. is about 1.1 times the size of Lam Research Corporation.
Revenue growth (YoY) is +7.8% for Applied Materials, Inc. and +26.0% for Lam Research Corporation.
Operating margin is 30.5% for Applied Materials, Inc. and 35.3% for Lam Research Corporation.
The P/E ratio (TTM) is 28.5x for Applied Materials, Inc. and 34.5x for Lam Research Corporation.
Dividend yield is 0.59% for Applied Materials, Inc. and 0.56% for Lam Research Corporation.
In each row, the better figure is highlighted based only on the number itself. This does not say which is the better investment.
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc.Technology | LRCXLam Research CorporationTechnology | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Market cap | $264B | $251B |
| Share price | $332.71 | $200.44 |
| 1-year return | +43.3% | +24.2% |
| 5-year return | +126.2% | +245.2% |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E (TTM) | 28.5x | 34.5x |
| Forward P/E | 26.0x | 21.0x |
| P/S | 8.6x | 10.8x |
| P/B | 10.3x | 20.1x |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.9x | 28.5x |
| Profitability | ||
| Revenue (TTM) | $30.8B | $23.2B |
| Gross margin | 49.4% | 50.5% |
| Operating margin | 30.5% | 35.3% |
| Net margin | 30.1% | 31.3% |
| ROE | 40.4% | 67.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.8% | +26.0% |
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | +10.5% | +9.7% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | +17.2% | +16.4% |
| Dividends & balance sheet | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 0.56% |
| Years of dividend growth | — | — |
| FCF yield | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Debt/equity (lower = less debt) | 0.29x | 0.33x |
Other comparisons
Listed mechanically from public data. Not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.